This week I spent two days in a creative development for The Kerensky Project. Creative developments can differ wildly in their efficacy and usefulness for a writer. Some are more for the director than the writer. There have been times as a writer when I’ve wondered what I’m doing in the room, and whether the others need me at all in the process. But this one was different.
This creative development has been structured so well and has already been so useful to me that I’d like to share my discoveries with you. Some may seem obvious, but I hope this might be useful to other writers/creative teams considering creative developments.
- Decide what you want to achieve from this development and communicate it to everyone involved. Sounds obvious but this is often overlooked. For instance, is this development to help the writer work on a draft of the script? Perhaps it’s for the director to trial some new ways of working with the script? Or perhaps it’s for a group to collaborate together to come up with a new script? All perfectly valid – as long as everyone involved has signed up for the same process.
- Don’t confuse a creative development with a showing or rehearsed reading. Too often, we tack these on the end of creative developments and end up spending more time preparing for the reading than doing the developmental work we all signed up for.
- If the development has the aim of helping a writer complete a draft of a play, then talk to the writer about the best ways of going about this.
- You might like to split the development over several weeks (as we’re doing this time) to enable the writer to write new scenes.
- Use some of the resources for the writer to work with the director/dramaturg before the workshops with actors begin.
- Don’t feel constrained to stay sitting down reading words from a page all day: Let the actors act.
On day two of our creative development, director Michael Futcher split the actors into pairs and gave them scenes from the first draft to explore. They decided what they thought the drama of each scene was and then improvised the heart of the scenes back to me, the writer. This was incredibly useful for me. It showed me that the essence of the scene could often be shown in three lines – it didn’t need the five pages I’d written. An actor lives and breathes life into your characters. You don’t have to labour points because a good actor will convey your message with the minimum words.
I’m taking the red pen to everything I’ve done so far. The three-hour opus I’ve written can easily be half the length.




